Good Boys who learned from their based professors in collitch--academic leftist grad students with accounts on here--repeat Chomsky reddit-tier mythology, they confuse it for history. Thus, they have no idea that globalism and decolonization go hand-in-hand, globalism requires it

Settler white ruling classes and middle classes in 3d World commandeered local resources for themselves, and mother countries derived benefits (not always financial as in case of Portugal) for themselves. This arrangement was unacceptable to post-WW2 international finance

Globalism required that massive resources and markets of the 3d World be exploited by its own corporations/agents and not, say for benefit of Portugal only. Anticolonial ("based socialist nationalist!") struggles were supported by globalist factions, including working w Soviets.

I covered this several times on Caribbean Rhythms, with examples. In Congo or Angola, pro-white (procolonial) leaders (eg Tshombe) were removed by anticolonial insurgency/coup and replaced with Based Socialist/Nationalist leaders who immediately gave contracts to globalist firms

Thus old alliance of FACTIONS in American Deep State (CIA/State Dept), international communism (Soviets, etc.) and local Based Nationalist-Morales type "anticolonial" leaders to remove nuisance white minorities/whiterule so that resources could be exploited by verminoid faction.

The example of Rhodesia is very important here. Entire world stood against Rhodesia--the UK, Sweden funding Soviet and Chinese-backed insurgency so the white minority could be politically removed, opening country for their own interests. Ex SS men fought commies in 3d world...

This is all unknown to the pro-immigration, antiwhite leftist grad students or "3d positionists" promoting scam on here that they're somehow "anti-establishment." There's no abstract "globalism" or "nationalism," must judge each nation own case; because different factions vying.

This twet still makes lying leftoids sputtering mad months later. Strange to see! I still strongly support the removal of Morales, who was the anteefa/B L*m project in Bolivia: erase "colonial heritage," tear down statues, persecute/dispossess white middle class.

Disingenuous people pretend Evo Morales was a BASED nationalist standing up to CIA/Wall St./"Zionism" and for the common Bolivian man. They're counting on you not knowing about Morales' overt antiwhite racism: "erase colonial past" does that sound familiar to you?

Morales' erasure of Bolivia's white history was ideological cover for his attempt to plunder and squeeze dry its productive white minority. These, and not the CIA, rose up and defended themselves, removed him. That said, I support CIA anticommunist action in South America. Why?

For incidental reasons, the anticommunist middle class in South America was and is European. And I side with white civilization and nations, not with ideologies. I covered on show in more detail how, almost against itself, the CIA *at times* ended up supporting the right side.

Disingenuous people count on your thinking in cookie-cutter ideological terms--but as you can see, supposedly "based nationalist" Morales had exactly same program and concerns as B*L*M/1619 project. And same people who support these and the current antiwhite riots, supported him.

Wall St. supported Bolshevism; globalism supports opening markets to Chyna; capitalists have no problem supporting commie nations, they use them as sweatshops. Hitl0r opposed communism. You may find that the historical frame of the academic left is ignorant and incoherent...

Putrefacted remnants of the academic left, repeating old university clichees repackaged as "third positionist" or "based anti-IMF socialist," are very mad at me, City Bureaucrat, a few others who expose their lies: they are at bottom antiwhite, pro-3d world immigration.