Aspiring Nudist Bodybuilder. Free speech and anti-xenoestrogen activist. Get my book! amazon.com/Bronze-Age-Mindse…
Joined March 2017
- Tweets 74,198
- Following 9,310
- Followers 74,081
- Likes 114,982
Little-understood part of why physiq poasting is psychological warfare: I know THEIR obsessions...note they salivate over special forces guys...how Hillary/Kamala/Obama easily provoked to cartoonish displays of "strength"; Douthat & co. also VERY rattled by types of men I poast.
5
8
181
This is a disease among American ruling class; for a long time was the stereotype lefties had of neocons, and is largely correct: portly neurotic dwarves with power fantasies, "masculinity issues"...but it also describes the Ben Rhodes/CIA left. VERY triggered by Putler trolling
3
10
149
Do they actually believe this was the human, sober alternative to Drumpf...or is this their spirit animal...powerhungry, capricious, bloodthirsty, concerned with projecting STRENF. Do you see why I trigger them so?
5
8
128
3,958
Absurd and unacceptable that Cortes was banned. He is a frand, he also is never impolite, never tweeted out anything questionable, and yes wasn't much concerned with politics.
Fitness expert and lifestyle development writer Alexander Cortes has been banned from Twitter for reasons no one can understand. Cortes isn't political.
cernovich.com/alexander-cort…
Show this thread
18
21
204
another question is OK let's say this is not a "one off"; and whether or not it is the cause of AIDS in humans overall, is it a model for "something else" in other words are there things like this that are transmitted but not infectious/pathogens? Are they studied?
2
0
2
sure but the study shows that it WAS induced without HIV. see the next study I linked as well. It's OK to keep asserting these things, but I've never seen an explanation for these studies
1
0
0
idk though yes to a layman like me this sounds very strange. That you can induce this disease without any pathogen. Granted humans =/= mice, but as you know there are questions in the human case as well and how can you rule this out in the human case is the question
1
0
0
Interesting thred that explains the study I linked. Study conclusion should be actually that AIDS isn't induced by a pathogen at all...it wasn't in the case of the mice (the only animal model for the disease), and it might not be in the case of humans either.
Okay I will begin discussion of the mouse model itself, staying strictly to what the paper says.
Will translate academic jargon into language all frogs can understand
Will offer opinion/editorialisation later
3
1
25
yes very interesting; I guess the question is why this isn't applicable to the human case as well, in which case it wouldn't be caused by a pathogen but by the "same thing" that induced it in the mice...
3
0
8
The most serious and influential readers of Plato in the 20th Century: Mussolini (Republic) Khomeini (Laws)
how does this maek you feel?
23
22
227
well look highlighted part...they get mice through a technique to test positive for HIV antibodies (which is btw the ONLY way that HIV is actually known) when they haven't actually been exposed to it
0
0
0
Coffee or get high quality organic tea (about $16-$20/lb) or cacao (same)...don't use caffeine pills pls
1
0
2
No troll, I'm genuinely interested in understanding this creepy and much-ignored study. It's the only animal model of AIDS that's worked...and it's non-infectious/not induced by a pathogen. Can any biologycel explain this? (full text at link)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8986…
9
7
56
